Freddy Gomez
Apropos of a Foreword. José Peirats’s Second Death
... or How Enric Ucelay Da Cal, eminent representative of academia, in his foreword to José Peirats’s Memoirs, has invented a brand new method of intellectual execution: post mortem abuse

José Peirats (1908-1989), who was a brick-maker and worker-journalist before
becoming one of the finest experts in Spanish anarchism, has often been cited in the
columns of A Contretemps, and there are at least two reasons for that. One, because
during the 1930s his role as a militant (he being on the editorial panel of Solidaridad
Obrera at the time) placed him right at the heart of the “revolutionary gymnastics” that
were to culminate in July 1936 in a revolutionary process of unparalleled dimensions.

That revolution which even now continues to feed — as well as question — the
libertarian imagination. Peirats saw its dawning and later witnessed its inexorable
petering out as it found itself trapped in the hellish logic of warfare. Two, because he
made up him mind to become its painstaking historian and in the 1950s produced a
critical work of immense analytical and documentary merits—La CNT en la revolución
española1— a crucial accomplishment for that time. The impeccable rectitude he
demonstrated at times when at various points in its history the CNT trespassed against
the fundamental principles by which it was governed, and the intellectual rigour with
which he strove to fathom the reasons for such deviations made Peirats a most
extraordinary individual and, without question, one of the most praiseworthy
representatives of a generation of activists since deceased.

Given the interest we take in Peirats, news of the publication of hisMemoirs was very
welcome to us since we had been looking forward to publication for quite some time.
In fact, writtenmostly in 1974 and 1975, this long, autobiographical text—some 1300
typewritten pages of it—foundered at the beginning of the 1980s on the demands of
some booksellers, Planeta for one, who stated that they were eager to publish it but only
an abridged version, focusing on the author’s recollections of his boyhood, adolescence
and pre-(civil)war experiences as is the usual practice in such publishedmemoirs. Peirats,
who could be very stubborn, doggedly refused any such abridgements, finding it much
preferable that his Memoirs should not appear than that they appear in a truncated
version. Which is why he turned to his representative in dealings with publishers, his
friend the Uruguayan historian and sociologist CarlosM. Rama who rejected any such
offer. As far as he was concerned it was all or nothing. So, for want of a publisher deserving of the name, nothing it was. Since which the only inkling we have had of
thoseMemoirs is down to Peirats himself as he agreed at the end of the 1980s to a request
from the Barcelona review Anthropos to select some extracts from his memoirs, a
selection that appeared shortly after Peirats’s death in the “Antologías temáticas”
collection of that review.